Fifteen Hours Wasn't the Answer

Published on August 5, 2026 at 6:00 PM

Why performing at a high level is not the same as leading sustainably.

I was an assistant principal for six years before becoming a principal. By year two, I noticed something unsettling, the kind of realization that arrives quietly and then will not leave you alone once you have had it. Every year looked identical to the one before it. I had stopped learning, even while I kept working just as hard, or harder, than I had at the start.

I remember the specific afternoon that thought first surfaced, sitting in a meeting that felt like a rerun of a meeting I had already sat through the year before, down to the same objections, the same solutions proposed and shelved, the same fatigue in the room. I looked around and thought, with a kind of dull surprise, we are doing this again, and I am not sure any of us are actually growing from it.

By year four, the truth had become impossible to keep avoiding. I was regularly working fifteen hour days, and the work was never actually done, no matter how late I stayed or how many weekends I quietly sacrificed to catch up. There was no finish line waiting for me at the end of enough hours. There was only more, arriving faster than I could clear it, a treadmill dressed up as a to-do list.

✦ ✦ ✦

Subscribe to the Weekly Roundup

Every Friday, one email with the week's Leadership Behind the Scenes articles. A headline and a one-line synopsis for each, so you choose what to read and skip the rest. No daily inbox clutter. Just the stories worth your time, once a week.

✦ ✦ ✦

I want to describe what those days actually felt like, because performing at a high level while unsustainable does not look dramatic from the outside. It looks like competence. I arrived early. I stayed late. My campus ran well by every visible measure. Parents were satisfied. Test scores held steady. If you had observed me during that season, you would have seen a capable, dedicated administrator, not a woman quietly running on fumes.

What you would not have seen was the specific exhaustion that had become so constant it no longer registered as exceptional. I stopped noticing I was tired the way you stop noticing a hum in a room after enough time living inside it. I ate lunch at my desk, most days, while returning emails. I brought work home most nights, not because anyone required it, but because the volume simply did not fit inside the hours I was officially supposed to be working.

There was a particular evening, a Thursday, when I sat in my car in the school parking lot after everyone else had gone home, too tired to drive yet, just sitting there in the quiet, and I remember thinking, with a clarity that startled me, I cannot keep doing this and also be a whole person. The thought did not feel dramatic. It felt like simple arithmetic finally catching up with years of avoiding the sum.

I was, by every outward measure, performing at a high level. My campus ran well. My results looked solid on paper. And underneath that performance, I was overwhelmed every single day, in a way that had simply become normal enough that I stopped registering it as a problem worth solving.

I want to be honest about how long it took me to separate those two things in my own mind, high performance and sustainable leadership. I had quietly assumed they were the same thing, or at least that one was simply the visible cost of the other. For years, I paid that cost without questioning whether it was actually required, telling myself that this was simply what dedication looked like, that anyone doing the job well would be paying the same price.

Performing at a high level while unsustainable is not success. It is a countdown, and the fact that no one can see the clock does not mean it is not running.

What finally shifted was not a single dramatic realization. It was the slow, cumulative weight of watching the pattern repeat itself, year after identical year, until the cost became too obvious to keep rationalizing away. I started, slowly, asking harder questions about what actually required my personal hours and what had simply always been done that way because no one had stopped to question it.

Some of what I found surprised me. Meetings that existed because they had always existed, not because they still served a purpose. Approvals that funneled through me by habit rather than necessity. Tasks I had never delegated because delegating them felt, in the moment, like it would take longer than simply doing them myself, a calculation that made sense in any single week and became a trap across years of single weeks stacked on top of each other.

If your results currently look strong from the outside while your actual capacity has been quietly eroding for longer than you want to admit, I want you to hear this plainly. The absence of visible failure is not the same as the presence of sustainability. Those two things can coexist for years before the gap between them finally becomes impossible to ignore, and the longer you wait to examine that gap honestly, the more expensive the eventual correction tends to be, both for you and for the people depending on you to still be standing when it counts.

I think about the version of myself sitting in that parking lot often, mostly with compassion now rather than the frustration I felt toward her at the time. She was not lazy or poorly organized. She was operating inside a definition of dedication that had never once been questioned, handed down through every leader she had ever watched, none of whom had modeled a sustainable alternative for her to learn from instead. Unlearning that definition took longer than building it had, and I am still, in some ways, practicing the unlearning even now, years into leading differently.

What finally convinced me the change was worth the discomfort was not a single crisis. It was the slow accumulation of small evidence, weeks where I left at a reasonable hour and nothing on my campus fell apart, decisions I delegated that turned out fine without my direct oversight, proof, gathered gradually, that the fifteen hour days had never actually been protecting the outcomes I believed they were protecting. They had simply been protecting my own certainty that I was indispensable, a certainty that turned out to be far less true than it felt at the time.

I still remember the first week I left campus by five o'clock every single day, an entire week, and spent an evening simply reading a novel, something I had not done in years. I felt guilty the entire time, as though I were getting away with something I had not earned. That guilt took much longer to unlearn than the actual time management did. Sustainability, I have come to believe, is not primarily a scheduling problem. It is an identity problem, one that requires you to separate your worth from your hours long after your calendar has already changed.

I do not think I fully arrived at that separation until years later, honestly. Some days I still catch the old instinct rising, the quiet suspicion that rest means I have stopped caring as much. I have simply gotten faster at naming that instinct for what it is, and quicker to choose differently anyway.

-- Dr. Rhonda

 

The Next Step: If your results still look strong while you privately feel like you are running on fumes, take The Close the Leadership Gap Diagnostic™. It is built to help you see the gap between performing well and leading sustainably before the gap closes on its own terms.

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.